Comparing HREBSD with conventional EBSD
Residual strain affects most aspects of a material’s performance. Standard SEM based EBSD primarily provides maps of the spatial distribution of crystal orientation, i.e. crystallographic texture and nearest neighbour misorientation also known as meso-structure. These factors arise from the orientation relationship between the internal stress state and the crystal slip systems and contribute to the mechanical properties of polycrystalline materials.

Clearly, the details of a material’s stress state also need to be understood but attempts using conventional EBSD have only yielded qualitative and semi-quantitative results.
The introduction of cross-correlation based HREBSD means the internal stress state can now be quantitatively mapped and the interaction between the applied load and the features of the internal structure revealed.
Read More
How CrossCourt4 works
CrossCourt4 uses high quality EBSD patterns from any EBSD system as its input data. Cross Correlation (XCF) methods are then used to measure relative changes in the patterns due to distortion in the crystal lattice caused by stress. Results generated by CrossCourt4 include the entire relative distortion matrix for each data point along with several measures of data quality. Traditional EBSD methods using the Hough Transform are sensitive to 0.5° compared to XCF at 0.006°.

CrossCourt4 can be configured to suit your analytical needs and is designed to:
- Work on multiprocessor workstations, automatically scaling in relation to the available CPU hardware
- Allow use on high powered Windows’ tablets thanks to its touchscreen facility.
- Keep the focus on the data and data visualisation with a clean and uncluttered user interface.
- Help the user smoothly drive the application, without lengthy menus or risk of confusion with item selection, enabled by the novel use of navigation widgets.
Read More